These were first outlined through the British Weights and Measures Act of Before using the imperial system, Winchester Standards were used beginning in the 16th century.
The imperial system is used for measurements, including area, mass, and volume. For length, units of measurement in the imperial system include inches, feet, links, yards, poles, miles, and leagues, to name a few. When measuring area, imperial units include square feet, perches, roods, and acres. Nice try but the vast majority of Americans have no clue on metric.
For example, they don't even know how far a kilometer is compared with a mile. Interestingly, the British still officially use miles for road signs. Stones and pounds for a person's weight, and feet and inches for a person's height, are only used in everyday parlance among older generations. Although Canada adopted SI on April 1, to some hatdcore Canadians this was indeed a joke we still use Imperial measures widely, in fact exclusively in construction and plumbing.
In western Canada temperatures are still announced in F and C in medias. Elders tend to state distances in miles although our maps and traffic signs are exclusively metric. Yes, the myth that US does not use metric system is really stupid.
But this is still true that only US, Liberia and Myanmar in the whole world use only or mostly imperial system. And the fact that US was one of the original countries to sign the Metre Convention, only makes it look worse. Yanno, the real question I have is why does anyone care? If it is such an inconvenience, feel free to live somewhere else. Literally, almost anywhere else Using the current customs of the rest of the world as some sort of guiding principal is as logically empty as admonishing a holdout for refusing to use leeches for headaches in the dark ages.
Lets be honest, even many of the SI units are fundamentally meaningless. How many times has the Meter changed? The gram? Lets look no further than a article from Physics World:. The changes will now come into force on 20 May The point is, enough is enough. The condescending stream of preaching about the United State's refusal to adopt the metric system has grown dull.
You want to know why the US doesn't use the metric system? Its arbitrary, just like the Imperial system. The metric system has at least given us a framework for how to base an entire measurement system off of a pointless, arbitrary creation like the meter.
Now lets build one that is actually universal. Dare I say one that is based off of something substantial, apparently universal, and easily attainable, like the hydrogen atom? Then perhaps the electron? At least it would be something fundamental to the cosmos, as opposed to some arbitrary construct which has had to be redefined half a dozen times in the last years. Make a meaningful system with true foresight and longevity, we will gladly change.
Continue to argue for swapping out one arbitrary system for another simply because "everyone is doing it" and its easier to multiply? Moving on Oh, and since base 12 mathematics are apparently too hard for anyone outside of the U. I would hate to make anyone resort to using elementary school multiplication after all.
No, the lenght didn't change, only the definitions and protocoles were improved for additional rigour. Seriously, in the era of micro-processors and nanotechnologies, do you really think it's still consistent to use primitive measures as the finger of someone, its foot or a random stone? There is a lenght unit now carrefully defined and based on the most precise way humanity was able for the metre speed of light and one for the mass based on water at sea level of a cubic tenth of that lenght, the whole metric system is named by comprehensive terms and logically dividable with the base the world decided to use whether 12 might have been better without having to do multiple conversions and used everywhere.
Long story short, imperial is not compatible even with itself. If you're happy with that, good for you but I and many others want better than mediocrity for our country! The US is already metric; and will eventually become fully metric.
The problem is that it is not happening fast enough. NIST needs to push harder. The new generations are not recalcitrant like previous generations, and will indeed accept the new system. We just need to educate. The meter is an arbitrary unit of measure that is subdivided by the number of digits on our hands.
There is nothing 'better' about that. If we had three fingers and a thumb, then you would be talking about how wonderful the base-8 system is and, you know what, it WOULD be better than base because there would be no rounding errors in computer programs. The worse excuse I've ever heard from an engineer, who should have known better, was to talk about how we should go metric because computers use it.
Computers are constantly having to convert as best as they can from base-2 to base In the English system, you use base-2 because it is practical. YES, fractional inches are in base-2, the most efficient system possible - the reason computers use it! It would be nonsense to go through the trouble of trying to make base "bits" because WE have 10 digits, computers should, too?? Using base-2, you only have the sizes that are practical as size increases. You can see this most easily in a mechanic's toolbox.
In the range of normally encountered automotive sockets, I have 15 English sockets and 24 Metric sockets. That's what happens when you use an arbitrary base system. On a private level, I tried years ago to go to the Meter. It was terrible. When you are using the inch, you subdivide by base-2 units i. You want to place a screw in the center of an inch-based board?
Divide by 2. When I wanted to place a screw at the center of cm based board, I had to go to mm to divide by 2! I also have to say something about the commentor who claimed that time is in the metric system: Were you even serious? Time units, from day to second, are Base24, Base60, Base The same goes for circular measure, there are degrees because it is so practical.
Try metric on that. I think that I might have missed your point, but even if we measure with fractional inches in base2, we are still using the numeric system in base Did you mean to criticize the metric system or the usage of a numeric system in base10?
Because the former is just a consequence to the latter. Of course there would be no point of a decimal metric system if we used a base 8 system. I grew up in Europe with the metric system and only used imperial units for floppy disks and monitor sizes. Everything else is metric. Moved to the USA as an adult and after an adjustment period I like the imperial system a lot better.
The reasons are much in line with Mr Michael Gorsich above. When you have a base 12 or 16 it is much easier to calculate fractions. Look at the number of wrenches and the number of different threads in the metric system. Compare to the SAE standards.
The SAE standards are much more practical. The imperial measurement system is comprised of units that everyday people found useful for their everyday use.
The French metric system is comprised of units scientists in a lab decided on and forced everybody else to use. In the crowdsourcing model there are a number of different ideas. Since it is impracticable for everybody to use different solutions, there is a natural selection and only the most popular ideas prevail.
You can see this in the imperial system - there were originally a lot more units of measurement, most of which have been deprecated. In the central planning model there is one decisionmaker, which can be a single person or a committee, and everybody else will be forced to "agree to disagree".
The central planning method often comes up with higher levels of organization, elegancy, consistency. The crowdsourcing model often has more taylored solutions, moe choices, but more chaotic. Think of "master-planned" neighborhoods vs an old country lane.
Think of communism vs free enterprise. It is no surprise that a government agency would favor control. But it's not just the government. Most people these days favor control over freedom. That's why we have things like HomeOwners Associations. People want every last piece of grass controlled. We have air conditioning, heat, humidifiers, dehumidifiers, every aspect of most people's environment is tightly controlled.
We've created a world where control, conformity,egality is expected, respected, normalized. Freedom and diversity is loathed and dismissed as simplistic, uneducated, primitive. Embrace diversity. Dare to be different. Let the rest of the world turn into Borg drones if they so desire. We go our own way. With climate change being such a 'hot' topic right now, in order to fully take part in international discussions, it would make sense if the USA at least used the same unit of temperature as the rest of the world!
Looking at the broader issue of measurement, I find it so strange that whilst America has advanced science and technology in so many areas but yet their political leaders have lacked the foresight to fully change to metric which would make international trade and the exchange of information so much easier for them.
Unfortunately, polititions, probably due to their education are often scientifically illiterate and don't appreciate the benifits that full metrication would bring to the USA. And the problem that was found is that the kilogram was losing weight for a completely unknown reason. The metric system can be traced back almost entirely to a single person: Gabriel Mouton.
Mouton, who was a vicar in Lyon, France, created in a measurement system that was later called the metric system. The proposals he made — such as basing a unit on the length of a pendulum swing — evolved and changed as scientists and committees continued working on it. The real key to the system was defining measurements in powers of 10, so 10 centimeters is a decimeter, 10 decimeters is a meter, and so on.
This makes it a lot easier to do the math on than, say, 12 inches to a foot, three feet to a yard, and 1, yards to a mile. In , the French Academy of Sciences appointed a committee to fully devise a logical system of measurements.
Scientists in France were particularly in favor of this system because the use of powers of 10 made it much simpler than other systems. After the system was fully devised, it took a few decades to catch on.
In , 17 countries including the United States attended the Convention of the Metre to further standardize the measurements, and by , 35 countries had adopted the system. Over the past century, the system was steadily adopted by most countries. A universal standard of measurement made it easier for countries to engage in international trade, exchange information and cooperate more generally. With every other country in the world adopting the metric system, you have to wonder why Liberia, Myanmar and the United States are holdouts.
For a long time, it seemed like the United States would adopt the metric system. The country sent delegates to the Convention of the Metre in , and in had passed a bill making it lawful to use the metric system in an official capacity.
0コメント